Re: [PATCH] parport: Revert "parport: fix memory leak"

Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-25T17:22:40Z

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 01:19:40PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 2) Why the dmesg showed "panel: could not claim access to parport0. Aborting."?
> Because of 50566ac87065 ("parport: check exclusive access before
> register") the panel driver should not even register and it
> should have failed at parport_register_dev_model().
Because panel is not claiming exclusive access of parport.

regards
sudip