From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753818AbbG0MaI (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:30:08 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:52259 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753791AbbG0MaE (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:30:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:27:58 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Linus Walleij Cc: Hans de Goede , Chen-Yu Tsai , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: sunxi: Add custom irq_domain_ops Message-ID: <20150727122758.GU2564@lukather> References: <1437396074-15791-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1437396074-15791-4-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uN3tURjgVTLfI0kr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --uN3tURjgVTLfI0kr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:04:38PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: >=20 > > The current interrupt parsing code was working by accident, because the > > default was actually parsing the first node of interrupts. > > > > While that was mostly working (and the flags were actually ignored), th= is > > binding has never been documented, and doesn't work with SoCs that have > > multiple interrupt banks anyway. > > > > Add a proper interrupt xlate function, that uses the same description t= han > > the GPIOs ( ), that will make things less confusing. > > > > The EINT number will still be used as the hwirq number, but won't be > > exposed through the DT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard >=20 > This patch does not apply to the pinctrl devel branch. >=20 > Does it need to be rebased or do I need to merge in fixes? >=20 > Holding patch 3/4 and 4/4 until this is resolved. I'll rebase and resend the last 2 patches. Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --uN3tURjgVTLfI0kr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVtiPOAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgrEIP/0W7qEpmrKHtU2VgJA8zLxXu 1ZLgvukvqVhdcboLeSpjjIY7RNLvRl+5tRaaAEBBobyBFl0cpyrEnC3Fi0lca1pJ 42E9oJBjYv3zR9dr6rxJb3XE79erm2E/DQHmOsaxpDMWJT8fx/xdXUxspiXb0VeY TLCq7suLJkLH4l4Hwf0J6VrGgW0j3BiE6zKFSwxRtHYEMp1/w03rbyhMCrFVLoHq yp0kJrwFwGs4zLi+wM+eF3AibcZ1+VnwwUCKYDzX1xvqr/YaiYpGQR3GpWc0nk0w mQjebheQibamonw4ABWAJYfMb4EWUzgZHDRc08OdWvZro+ojoF9eAcZ7jkkQLDvY aH7TOUDJOC95+1QnAKLHl73/DCZ4v2pxeY3Npt9xuN3+qsYgAnq/hnpYs2alU2Iu vaLrQYtlQZB1obI7PiPJWRv+HTRPZM2LUcwg3Os8hZruGBfonUQ9KPvQuoOWzCV9 b1Q0o0dmjhKMwqA+m9+j53YtnzDEQHkFdBU1etRfpcqSQyGE0L9DXT2+e3vuYXs9 A/S7CNVVFwJUCVpqDXdGJlagJgaX5pHzG5sTwNQTuIYoDXTDEMYSsnZXpC7n3qbi X/Lsh7CAcU+0VCtS2aFMQd6EYUWOVUgmlolr4UPb0ChlvWJRtH6EyY1UVnA2esgM 4T+0mCOKY1sn8vBRTanl =ps1A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uN3tURjgVTLfI0kr--