Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: sunxi: Add custom irq_domain_ops

Maxime Ripard
2015-07-27T12:30:08Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1201 bytes --]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:04:38PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > The current interrupt parsing code was working by accident, because the
> > default was actually parsing the first node of interrupts.
> >
> > While that was mostly working (and the flags were actually ignored), this
> > binding has never been documented, and doesn't work with SoCs that have
> > multiple interrupt banks anyway.
> >
> > Add a proper interrupt xlate function, that uses the same description than
> > the GPIOs (<bank> <pin> <flags>), that will make things less confusing.
> >
> > The EINT number will still be used as the hwirq number, but won't be
> > exposed through the DT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>
> This patch does not apply to the pinctrl devel branch.
>
> Does it need to be rebased or do I need to merge in fixes?
>
> Holding patch 3/4 and 4/4 until this is resolved.

I'll rebase and resend the last 2 patches.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]