public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	jasonbaron0@gmail.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@amacapital.net,
	tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	liuj97@gmail.com, rabin@rab.in, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	michael@ellerman.id.au, davem@davemloft.net, vbabka@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/8] jump_label: Another (better) static_key interface
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:46:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150729064600.GB3953@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150728132055.203176565@infradead.org>

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:20:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After yet another bug because of the weirdness of the static key interface,
> here an attempt at providing a better one.
> 
> This series is tested on x86_64 (by me) and s390x (heiko).

Works nice. You may include the s390 patch below, so the conversion to the
new interface happens when your code gets merged:

>From 3c9b5a2b9a90d6bb2b41f381f5f89b3657fe4ea5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:31:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] s390/uaccess: employ static_branch_likely()

Use the new static_branch_likely() primitive to make sure that the
most likely case is executed without taking an unconditional branch.
This wasn't possible with the old jump label primitives.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c b/arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c
index 4614d415bb58..93cb1d09493d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
 #include <asm/facility.h>
 
-static struct static_key have_mvcos = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE;
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(have_mvcos);
 
 static inline unsigned long copy_from_user_mvcos(void *x, const void __user *ptr,
 						 unsigned long size)
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_from_user_mvcp(void *x, const void __user *ptr,
 
 unsigned long __copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
 {
-	if (static_key_false(&have_mvcos))
+	if (static_branch_likely(&have_mvcos))
 		return copy_from_user_mvcos(to, from, n);
 	return copy_from_user_mvcp(to, from, n);
 }
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_to_user_mvcs(void __user *ptr, const void *x,
 
 unsigned long __copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
 {
-	if (static_key_false(&have_mvcos))
+	if (static_branch_likely(&have_mvcos))
 		return copy_to_user_mvcos(to, from, n);
 	return copy_to_user_mvcs(to, from, n);
 }
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_in_user_mvc(void __user *to, const void __user
 
 unsigned long __copy_in_user(void __user *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
 {
-	if (static_key_false(&have_mvcos))
+	if (static_branch_likely(&have_mvcos))
 		return copy_in_user_mvcos(to, from, n);
 	return copy_in_user_mvc(to, from, n);
 }
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static inline unsigned long clear_user_xc(void __user *to, unsigned long size)
 
 unsigned long __clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (static_key_false(&have_mvcos))
+	if (static_branch_likely(&have_mvcos))
 			return clear_user_mvcos(to, size);
 	return clear_user_xc(to, size);
 }
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ early_param("uaccess_primary", parse_uaccess_pt);
 static int __init uaccess_init(void)
 {
 	if (!uaccess_primary && test_facility(27))
-		static_key_slow_inc(&have_mvcos);
+		static_branch_enable(&have_mvcos);
 	return 0;
 }
 early_initcall(uaccess_init);
-- 
2.3.8


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-29  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-28 13:20 [PATCH -v2 0/8] jump_label: Another (better) static_key interface Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 13:20 ` [PATCH -v2 1/8] jump_label: Rename JUMP_LABEL_{EN,DIS}ABLE Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 13:20 ` [PATCH -v2 2/8] jump_label: Rename JUMP_LABEL_TYPE_* Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29 12:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-28 13:20 ` [PATCH -v2 3/8] jump_label: Add jump_entry_key() helper Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 13:20 ` [PATCH -v2 4/8] jump_label: Add static_key_{en,dis}able() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 13:21 ` [PATCH -v2 5/8] jump_label: Rework update logic Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 13:21 ` [PATCH -v2 6/8] jump_label: Add a new static_key interface Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 17:00   ` Rabin Vincent
2015-07-28 17:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29  6:43   ` Heiko Carstens
2015-07-29  7:19   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-29  8:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 19:03       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-03 19:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 19:28           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-03 20:00             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 21:57               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-04  3:37                 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-08-04  4:07                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-04  4:21                     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-08-04 12:06                   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-04 14:33                     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-08-04 14:41                       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-04 14:51                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-30 12:18   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-08-04  6:50   ` yalin wang
2015-08-04  9:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 13:21 ` [PATCH -v2 7/8] jump_label: Add selftest Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 21:46   ` Jason Baron
2015-07-29  8:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 13:21 ` [PATCH -v2 8/8] x86, tsc: Employ static_branch_likely() Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29 14:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-29  6:46 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2015-07-29  8:58   ` [PATCH -v2 0/8] jump_label: Another (better) static_key interface Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 17:03   ` [tip:locking/core] s390/uaccess, locking/static_keys: employ static_branch_likely() tip-bot for Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150729064600.GB3953@osiris \
    --to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=jasonbaron0@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rabin@rab.in \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox