From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754210AbbG2OHn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:07:43 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:34795 "EHLO
	mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752430AbbG2OHl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:07:41 -0400
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 19:37:35 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Update 2x][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration
 from CPU online
Message-ID: <20150729140735.GE5100@linux>
References: <7868353.pEStq1MJ2a@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <1739669.kedIsxdRK2@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <1702607.RH80fBCN6J@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <3091538.g8dYBumqSx@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20150729053248.GC21493@linux>
 <CAJZ5v0h7MiSJ+Sus1g8prBN3O6y98JDUPBQ=vjCQ1KG_yP22+A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0h7MiSJ+Sus1g8prBN3O6y98JDUPBQ=vjCQ1KG_yP22+A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 29-07-15, 16:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> You'd still need policy, so its definition and initialization would stay there.
> 
> The only thing you can save by doing that change is the ret variable,
> but I like the code more the way it is.

Okay, that's fine.

-- 
viresh