From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753862AbbG2TVS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:21:18 -0400
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:51173 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753378AbbG2TVP (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:21:15 -0400
Message-Id: <20150729190848.678796654@infradead.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.61-1
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 21:08:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, ralf@linux-mips.org,
        egtvedt@samfundet.no, michael@amarulasolutions.com,
        cmetcalf@ezchip.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: Remove finish_arch_switch()
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

There were only a few architectures utilizing finish_arch_switch() and it looks
like they can all do without.

This means we can remove finish_arch_switch(); partly to make up for
introducing finish_arch_post_lock_switch(), partly to reduce the number of arch
hooks to consider.

Much thanks to Ralf, Will and Chris for helping out with this!