From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755362AbbG3Juj (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:50:39 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:37032 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753897AbbG3Ju2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:50:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:50:11 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, ralf@linux-mips.org, egtvedt@samfundet.no, michael@amarulasolutions.com, cmetcalf@ezchip.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: Remove finish_arch_switch() Message-ID: <20150730095011.GD25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150729190848.678796654@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150729190848.678796654@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hi, > > There were only a few architectures utilizing finish_arch_switch() and it looks > like they can all do without. > > This means we can remove finish_arch_switch(); partly to make up for > introducing finish_arch_post_lock_switch(), partly to reduce the number of arch > hooks to consider. > > Much thanks to Ralf, Will and Chris for helping out with this! So the mips patch is already in Ralf's mips-next tree, which means I have to wait for that to his Linus' tree before I can commit the last patch in this series. It also means that all the other patches can go through their respective arch tree. So anybody who feels so inclined, go ahead, I'll check after the next merge window and commit everything that's left -- unless there's objections of course :-)