From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755384AbbG3Kwk (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 06:52:40 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:46416 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755337AbbG3Kwh (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 06:52:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:51:54 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Michal Suchanek , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Padmavathi Venna , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20150730105154.GN11162@sirena.org.uk> References: <557c1962448393b2a8736f26bfa2a3a5ba4aeb7a.1438170519.git.hramrach@gmail.com> <20150730095051.06eff8b1@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GS4hgKuWjO35gvSO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150730095051.06eff8b1@bbrezillon> X-Cookie: Stay together, drag each other down. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dt: spi: s3c64xx: add compatible to controller-data X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --GS4hgKuWjO35gvSO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Since you have to patch your DTs anyway, how about putting your > partitions in a subnode and patch the ofpart code to parse this subnode > if it is present (see the following patch). This is the best idea, yes - if we're changing the DT for the system anyway then making a sane binding and using that seems better than trying to mitigate problems with the old bindings. --GS4hgKuWjO35gvSO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVugHFAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQH9cH/1S6NbHQrmi/jf+A98rqZo3l 81E0I2rLeyM1yprSA9pKVHUga36sXGu6+/Dpwib19s8xr3O0qj8CLEtPguL5itz/ 5X6lBKOPrXWDb6rWoRIaU9sR1iMSuwHCrfooX5Buxp+hiTiGYRWQ62/F+da1B/sm MMFStwQdxwsDjEBuK2Lk2nAyQC0ROwn37p8zqjgbJVZ7jY6JDDKduWpnHfEU4hft jacOBSj8kG3W4ADEyTt3fagD/HuM6HYpvvxE+HINgISrYgcmlGwkT33YxCPaB0z2 CrskLgl3DnG21WMB20O82Ru/5BpV/jp+6XjpmPJiv6klfRPEXcLaL7Z2aecRnCE= =ynHd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GS4hgKuWjO35gvSO--