From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755411AbbG3LBT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:01:19 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:33811 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754607AbbG3LBR (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:01:17 -0400
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:31:10 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:SUPERH" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: subsys: update return type of ->remove_dev() to void
Message-ID: <20150730110110.GA24546@linux>
References: <02c0569741812b655edde5124c3e2937bb79f9f8.1438248445.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <20150730105917.GA25460@nazgul.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20150730105917.GA25460@nazgul.tnic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 30-07-15, 12:59, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:04:01PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Its return value is not used by the subsys core and nothing meaningful
> > can be done with it, even if we want to use it. The subsys device is
> > anyway getting removed.
> 
> I'm assuming sysfs paths covered by it, will remain intact... ? For the
> microcode loader case that's this hierarchy here:
> 
> $ tree /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu?/microcode/
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/microcode/
> ├── processor_flags
> └── version
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/microcode/
> ├── processor_flags
> └── version

Yeah, Its not touching the sysfs path at all.

-- 
viresh