From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>,
Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] block: loop: support DIO & AIO
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:42:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150730164233.GA14158@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438256184-23645-7-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 07:36:24AM -0400, Ming Lei wrote:
> + /*
> + * When working at direct I/O, under very unusual cases,
> + * such as unaligned direct I/O from application and
> + * access to loop block device with 'unaligned' offset & size,
> + * we have to fallback to non-dio mode.
> + *
> + * During the switch between dio and non-dio, page cache
> + * has to be flushed to the backing file.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(lo->use_dio && lo->last_use_dio != cmd->use_aio))
> + vfs_fsync(lo->lo_backing_file, 0);
Filesystems do the cache flushing for you.
> +static inline bool req_dio_aligned(struct loop_device *lo,
> + const struct request *rq)
> +{
> + return !((blk_rq_pos(rq) << 9) & lo->dio_align) &&
> + !(blk_rq_bytes(rq) & lo->dio_align);
> +}
> +
> static int loop_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> const struct blk_mq_queue_data *bd)
> {
> @@ -1554,6 +1658,13 @@ static int loop_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
> return -EIO;
>
> + if (lo->use_dio && !lo->transfer &&
> + req_dio_aligned(lo, bd->rq) &&
> + !(cmd->rq->cmd_flags & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_DISCARD)))
> + cmd->use_aio = true;
> + else
> + cmd->use_aio = false;
But honestly run time switching between buffered I/O and direct I/O from
the same I/O stream is almost asking for triggering every possible
race in the dio vs buffered I/O synchronization. And there have been
a lot of those..
I'd feel much more comfortable with a setup time check.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 11:36 [PATCH v8 0/6] block: loop: improve loop with AIO Ming Lei
2015-07-30 11:36 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] fs: direct-io: don't dirtying pages for ITER_BVEC/ITER_KVEC direct read Ming Lei
2015-07-30 11:36 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] block: loop: set QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES for request queue of loop Ming Lei
2015-07-30 11:36 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] block: loop: use kthread_work Ming Lei
2015-07-30 11:36 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] block: loop: prepare for supporing direct IO Ming Lei
2015-07-30 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-30 15:21 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-30 15:30 ` Dave Kleikamp
2015-07-30 15:45 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-30 11:36 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] block: loop: introduce ioctl command of LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO Ming Lei
2015-07-30 11:36 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] block: loop: support DIO & AIO Ming Lei
2015-07-30 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-07-31 3:13 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150730164233.GA14158@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=mpatlasov@parallels.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zab@zabbo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox