From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754409AbbG3Rgs (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:36:48 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:33713 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751430AbbG3Rgq (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:36:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:36:43 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: James Liao Cc: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= , Matthias Brugger , Mike Turquette , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Daniel Kurtz , Ricky Liang , Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] clk: mediatek: Removed unused dpi_ck clock from MT8173 Message-ID: <20150730173643.GH3159@codeaurora.org> References: <1438152754-11970-1-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> <1438152754-11970-2-git-send-email-jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> <6282882.pftQBj38E3@diego> <1438154233.17770.39.camel@mtksdaap41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1438154233.17770.39.camel@mtksdaap41> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/29, James Liao wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Could you help to apply this patch into 4.2? > > > Best regards, > > James > > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 09:05 +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2015, 14:52:25 schrieb James Liao: > > > The dpi_ck clock can be removed because it not actually used > > > in topckgen and subsystems. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: James Liao > > > > From our past discussions this change looks about right, and should still > > become _part of 4.2_, to not have the CLK_TOP_DPI become part of the > > devicetree CLK_TOP_DPI. Did you mean ABI? > > > > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner > > Is it being used in DT right now and causing regressions on v4.2-rcX? Sorry, I'm trying to understand why this patch matters for the 4.2 release. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project