From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752817AbbGaIvm (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:51:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:34863 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158AbbGaIvj (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:51:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:51:34 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, ralf@linux-mips.org, egtvedt@samfundet.no, michael@amarulasolutions.com, cmetcalf@ezchip.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: Remove finish_arch_switch() Message-ID: <20150731085134.GA6751@gmail.com> References: <20150729190848.678796654@infradead.org> <20150730095011.GD25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150730095011.GD25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There were only a few architectures utilizing finish_arch_switch() and it looks > > like they can all do without. > > > > This means we can remove finish_arch_switch(); partly to make up for > > introducing finish_arch_post_lock_switch(), partly to reduce the number of arch > > hooks to consider. > > > > Much thanks to Ralf, Will and Chris for helping out with this! > > So the mips patch is already in Ralf's mips-next tree, which means I > have to wait for that to his Linus' tree before I can commit the last > patch in this series. > > It also means that all the other patches can go through their respective > arch tree. > > So anybody who feels so inclined, go ahead, I'll check after the next > merge window and commit everything that's left -- unless there's > objections of course :-) Sounds sensible to me! Thanks, Ingo