From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
dong.su@ericsson.com, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: Clear MSRs on kexec
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:57:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150804135735.GP42530@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150804055229.GD14481@krava.redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 07:52:29AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:54:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:32:28PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > I'm getting following message on the kdump kernel start
> > >
> > > Broken BIOS detected, complain to your hardware vendor.\
> > > [Firmware Bug]: the BIOS has corrupted hw-PMU resources (MSR 38d is b0)
> > >
> > > it seems to be caused by NMI watchdog being configured
> > > and fixed counter values stays in MSRs, which triggers
> > > warning in check_hw_exists and disables perf support
> > > in kdump kernel.. which probably does not hurt ;-)
> > >
> > > zeroing MSRs during kdump shutdown seems to work (attached)
> > > but I'm not sure thats correct place for kdump perf callback
> >
> > Right, but why bother? All that kernel needs to do is write a memory
> > dump to someplace and reboot, right? The less you do, the less can go
> > wrong.
>
> well, I was hunting that 'Broken BIOS..' message which is wrong
It was the limitation we understood, when we implemented the
check_hw_exists() years ago.
>
> I wouldn't think anyone wants to use perf under kdump kernel,
> but you never know ;-)
The amount of warning messages in the kdump kernel is significant, this
message is just another message to add to the noise. Heck we have to poll
irqs because if we enable them, drivers would crash left and right due to
left over pending irqs from the previous kernel.
As Peter said, how much code are we going to put in the crash path to make
kdump less noisy?
Eric B. usually frowns pretty heavily on this.
Cheers,
Don
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-04 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-03 21:32 [RFC] perf: Clear MSRs on kexec Jiri Olsa
2015-08-03 21:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-04 5:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-08-04 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-04 13:57 ` Don Zickus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150804135735.GP42530@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=dong.su@ericsson.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox