From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make then NMI-safe
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:59:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150805085957.GA23893@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <040374ca9800988a0ed35ea9ddeb4a762c1371fa.1437690860.git.luto@kernel.org>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,10 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
> unsigned fsindex, gsindex;
> fpu_switch_t fpu_switch;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY
> + WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(irq_count));
> +#endif
Please introduce a less noisy (to the eyes) version of this, something like:
WARN_ON_DEBUG_ENTRY(this_cpu_read(irq_count));
or so, similar to WARN_ON_FPU().
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-05 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 22:37 [PATCH 0/3] x86_64: Make int3 non-magical Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-23 22:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make then NMI-safe Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-24 6:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-24 10:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-24 18:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 4:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 4:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 4:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 4:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 8:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-25 17:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-08-05 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-08-05 18:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-05 18:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-05 18:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-22 13:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-23 22:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/entry/64: Teach idtentry to use the IRQ stack Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-23 22:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/entry/64: Move #BP from IST to " Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-24 11:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-23 22:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64: Make int3 non-magical Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150805085957.GA23893@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).