From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754105AbbHFCyt (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:54:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53123 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753104AbbHFCyr (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:54:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:54:35 +1000 From: NeilBrown To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Al Viro , lkml , "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add new description of path-name lookup. Message-ID: <20150806125435.694d9ee3@noble> In-Reply-To: <55B5A880.8040500@infradead.org> References: <20150725102825.335e9d9a@noble> <55B5A880.8040500@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:41:52 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/24/15 17:28, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > Hi Neil, > > Some edits for you to consider. Wow, thanks. I think I agree with all ... had to do some research for "neither is" though. > > > +However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that. If > > +RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected > > +structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a-priori > > no hyphen: ^ Do you have an opinion on where I should but "a priori" in italics? I feel there needs to be something to make it clear the "a" is not an English "a". Jon: do you want an incremental patch, or a resend? Thanks, NeilBrown