From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dm: refactor ioctl handling
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:45:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806134527.GB1646@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150804175616.GA28971@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:56:16PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> This should be renamed to dm_prepare_ioctl_fn and the targets' hook
> would be .prepare_ioctl
>
> Open to other names but if the targets no longer issue the ioctl there
> is little point to call it .ioctl
Sure. I had ioctl_allowed first but that sounded so ugly that I
undid the renaming..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-04 7:11 Persistent Reservation API Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-04 7:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: cleanup blkdev_ioctl Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-12 0:29 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-08-04 7:11 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: add a API for persistent reservations Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-12 0:45 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-08-04 7:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] sd: implement the persisten reservation API Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-12 0:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-08-04 7:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] dm: refactor ioctl handling Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-04 17:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-08-06 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-08-04 7:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] dm: split out a helper to find the ioctl target Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-04 18:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-08-06 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-04 7:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] dm: add support for passing through persistent reservations Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-04 17:53 ` Persistent Reservation API Mike Snitzer
2015-08-06 13:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-04 18:04 ` Keith Busch
2015-08-06 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-15 12:10 Persistent Reservation API V4 Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-15 12:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] dm: refactor ioctl handling Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150806134527.GB1646@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox