From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ion: Add a default struct device for cma heap
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:57:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806165741.GA7626@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150806152515.GA30274@shbuild888>
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:25:15PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:40:28PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06 2015, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > When trying to use several cma heaps on our platforms,
> > > we met a memory issue due to that the several cma_heaps
> > > are sharing the same "struct device *".
> > >
> > > As in current code base, the normal cma heap creating
> > > process is, one platform device is created during boot,
> > > and it will sequentially create cma heaps (usually passing
> > > its own struct device * as a parameter)
> > >
> > > For the multiple cma heaps case, there will be one "struct
> > > cma" created for each cma heap, and this "struct cma *" is
> > > saved in dev->cma_area. So the single platform device can't
> > > meet the requirement here.
> > >
> > > So this patch add one default device for a cma heap to avoid
> > > sharing the same "struct device", thus fix the issue. And it
> > > doesn't break existing code by only using that default device
> > > when no "struct device *" is passed in.
> > >
> > > Also, since the cma framework has been cleaned up, this patch
> > > also add a platform data member to pass the "struct cma*" to
> > > ion_cma_heap_create().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> >
> > >From CMA’s point of view:
> >
> > Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h | 4 ++++
> > > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_cma_heap.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
> > > index 443db84..e9af17e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h
> > > @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ struct ion_buffer;
> > > * @size: size of the heap in bytes if applicable
> > > * @align: required alignment in physical memory if applicable
> > > * @priv: private info passed from the board file
> > > + * @priv2: when creating CMA heap, platform device should better also
> > > + * pass the "struct cma *" info, so that the cma buffer request
> > > + * know where to go for the buffer
> > > *
> > > * Provided by the board file.
> > > */
> > > @@ -56,6 +59,7 @@ struct ion_platform_heap {
> > > size_t size;
> > > ion_phys_addr_t align;
> > > void *priv;
> > > + void *priv2;
> >
> > Why are those void pointers anyway? Perhaps just make them struct device
> > *dev and struct cma *cma? Especially since priv2 is a bit awkward name.
>
> My initial thought is the same, but as there are several other kinds of ion
> heaps which are also using this structure for their own
> ion_xxx_heap_create(struct ion_platform_heap *), I gave up using the
> explicit "struct cma *", in case other kinds of heaps may need to use
> this additional priv2 in future
No, just make it a struct cma *, as that's what it is. Having multiple
void * is a sign of a very crazy interface.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-06 10:24 [PATCH] staging: ion: Add a default struct device for cma heap Feng Tang
2015-08-06 11:40 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2015-08-06 15:25 ` Feng Tang
2015-08-06 16:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150806165741.GA7626@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox