From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755628AbbHGHbq (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 03:31:46 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53517 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755559AbbHGHbo (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 03:31:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:31:43 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Jens Axboe , Alexander Graf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] loop: Enable correct physical blocksize Message-ID: <20150807073142.GA17618@lst.de> References: <1437118027-94602-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1437118027-94602-2-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20150727051552.GA15926@lst.de> <55B5C8D3.1000507@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B5C8D3.1000507@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:59:47AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 07/27/2015 07:15 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:27:04AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > >> When running on files the physical blocksize is actually 4k, > >> so we should be announcing it as such. This is enabled with > >> a new LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag value to the existing ioctl. > > > > The flag is only used in this patch, but not actually defined anywhere. > > > Ah, Merge error. > I'll fix it up. Can you resen the series?