From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753394AbbHGNML (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:12:11 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:55529 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753028AbbHGNMJ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:12:09 -0400
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:12:05 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
        Marc Gauthier <marc@cadence.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] xtensa: implement counting and sampling perf
 events
Message-ID: <20150807131205.GB3325@kernel.org>
References: <1437208216-15729-1-git-send-email-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
 <1437208216-15729-8-git-send-email-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
 <20150806194632.GC10826@kernel.org>
 <20150807091352.GD16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAMo8Bf+qsVRc6G3WvrKh0JiJTX64Ae6SxyBLfSFZG7sJLLVOMA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMo8Bf+qsVRc6G3WvrKh0JiJTX64Ae6SxyBLfSFZG7sJLLVOMA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 03:03:02PM +0300, Max Filippov escreveu:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:46:32PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> Em Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:30:10AM +0300, Max Filippov escreveu:
> >> > Xtensa Performance Monitor Module has up to 8 32 bit wide performance
> >> > counters. Each counter may be enabled independently and can count any

> >> Has this gone via PeterZ? I added the tools/ bits in my perf/core
> >> branch, will go in next pull req,

> > I was thinking it would go through the xtensa tree. Looks fine at a
> > quick glance and they can actually test it.
 
> Right, had the same idea.

Ok, when you do that, i.e. get the kernel bits in, the tooling part will
be there, as it was already pulled by Ingo, i.e. its in tip.git and thus
should hit 4.3.

- ARnaldo