public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations in libcfs
@ 2015-08-12  9:51 Maxime Lorrillere
  2015-08-12  9:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: fix symbol redeclared with different type " Maxime Lorrillere
  2015-08-14  5:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations " Sudip Mukherjee
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Lorrillere @ 2015-08-12  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: linux-kernel, Maxime Lorrillere

This patch fix the following sparse warnings in libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c:
>>> linux-debug.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'lnet_upcall' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>> linux-debug.c:65:6: warning: symbol 'lnet_debug_log_upcall' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Maxime Lorrillere <maxime.lorrillere@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c
index 4545d54..f0331fa 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c
@@ -61,8 +61,9 @@
 
 #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
 
-char lnet_upcall[1024] = "/usr/lib/lustre/lnet_upcall";
-char lnet_debug_log_upcall[1024] = "/usr/lib/lustre/lnet_debug_log_upcall";
+static char lnet_upcall[1024] = "/usr/lib/lustre/lnet_upcall";
+static char lnet_debug_log_upcall[1024] =
+	"/usr/lib/lustre/lnet_debug_log_upcall";
 
 /**
  * Upcall function once a Lustre log has been dumped.
-- 
2.5.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: fix symbol redeclared with different type in libcfs
  2015-08-12  9:51 [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations in libcfs Maxime Lorrillere
@ 2015-08-12  9:51 ` Maxime Lorrillere
  2015-08-14  5:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations " Sudip Mukherjee
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Lorrillere @ 2015-08-12  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: linux-kernel, Maxime Lorrillere

lbug_with_loc is declared with __attribute__((noreturn)) in libcfs_private.h
and without this attribute in linux-debug.c. This generates the following
sparse error:
>>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c:149:6: error: symbol 'lbug_with_loc' redeclared with different type (originally declared at drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/../../../include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h:82) - different modifiers

This patches removes this attribute in libcfs_private.h as it seems to me that
this optimization is not necessary.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Lorrillere <maxime.lorrillere@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
index 9544860..e60b92b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ do {									\
 
 #define KLASSERT(e) LASSERT(e)
 
-void lbug_with_loc(struct libcfs_debug_msg_data *)__attribute__((noreturn));
+void lbug_with_loc(struct libcfs_debug_msg_data *);
 
 #define LBUG()							  \
 do {								    \
-- 
2.5.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations in libcfs
  2015-08-12  9:51 [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations in libcfs Maxime Lorrillere
  2015-08-12  9:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: fix symbol redeclared with different type " Maxime Lorrillere
@ 2015-08-14  5:58 ` Sudip Mukherjee
  2015-08-14 14:00   ` Maxime Lorrillere
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2015-08-14  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxime Lorrillere
  Cc: Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Maxime Lorrillere wrote:
> This patch fix the following sparse warnings in libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c:
> >>> linux-debug.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'lnet_upcall' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >>> linux-debug.c:65:6: warning: symbol 'lnet_debug_log_upcall' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Lorrillere <maxime.lorrillere@gmail.com>
> ---
You have not build tested.

WARNING: "lnet_debug_log_upcall" [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs.ko] undefined!
WARNING: "lnet_upcall" [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs.ko] undefined!

regards
sudip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations in libcfs
  2015-08-14  5:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations " Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2015-08-14 14:00   ` Maxime Lorrillere
  2015-08-15  1:49     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Lorrillere @ 2015-08-14 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudip Mukherjee
  Cc: Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel

On vendredi 14 août 2015 à 11:28:35 (+0530), Sudip Mukherjee wrote
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Maxime Lorrillere wrote:
> > This patch fix the following sparse warnings in libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c:
> > >>> linux-debug.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'lnet_upcall' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >>> linux-debug.c:65:6: warning: symbol 'lnet_debug_log_upcall' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Lorrillere <maxime.lorrillere@gmail.com>
> > ---
> You have not build tested.
> 
> WARNING: "lnet_debug_log_upcall" [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs.ko] undefined!
> WARNING: "lnet_upcall" [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs.ko] undefined!

Sorry, I've only rebuild lustre separately.

Patch 2/2 builds fine, should I submit it separately ?

Regards,

Maxime

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations in libcfs
  2015-08-14 14:00   ` Maxime Lorrillere
@ 2015-08-15  1:49     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2015-08-15  1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxime Lorrillere
  Cc: Sudip Mukherjee, Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, linux-kernel

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 04:00:31PM +0200, Maxime Lorrillere wrote:
> On vendredi 14 août 2015 à 11:28:35 (+0530), Sudip Mukherjee wrote
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Maxime Lorrillere wrote:
> > > This patch fix the following sparse warnings in libcfs/linux/linux-debug.c:
> > > >>> linux-debug.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'lnet_upcall' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > >>> linux-debug.c:65:6: warning: symbol 'lnet_debug_log_upcall' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Lorrillere <maxime.lorrillere@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > You have not build tested.
> > 
> > WARNING: "lnet_debug_log_upcall" [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs.ko] undefined!
> > WARNING: "lnet_upcall" [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs.ko] undefined!
> 
> Sorry, I've only rebuild lustre separately.
> 
> Patch 2/2 builds fine, should I submit it separately ?

Yes please.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-15  1:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-12  9:51 [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations in libcfs Maxime Lorrillere
2015-08-12  9:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: fix symbol redeclared with different type " Maxime Lorrillere
2015-08-14  5:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fix static declarations " Sudip Mukherjee
2015-08-14 14:00   ` Maxime Lorrillere
2015-08-15  1:49     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox