From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the thermal-soc tree with the arm tree
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 07:54:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150817022407.GN1162@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150817121754.04736e67@canb.auug.org.au>
On 17-08-15, 12:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the thermal-soc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
>
> between commit:
>
> df6f527755a5 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: fix lockdep problems in cpu_cooling")
>
> from the arm tree and commits:
>
> 02373d7c69b4 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: fix lockdep problems in cpu_cooling")
> a24af233a1fd ("thermal/cpu_cooling: convert 'switch' block to 'if' block in notifier")
>
> from the thermal-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the first two look like two versions of the same patch,
> so I used the version from the thermal-soc tree) and can carry the fix
> as necessary (no action is required).
Right the version from the thermal tree is the updated version and
should be picked.
> Russell: that commit in your tree has no Signed-off-by :-(
No. It does have a SOB, but that followed a bit of rant/history on why
Russell carried this patch :)
Russell should be dropping that patch soon, AFAIU.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 2:17 linux-next: manual merge of the thermal-soc tree with the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-17 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-08-17 7:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-17 8:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-18 9:33 ` Eduardo Valentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150817022407.GN1162@linux \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox