From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751502AbbHRJIT (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2015 05:08:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:33844 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750893AbbHRJIR (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2015 05:08:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:38:13 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: trivial@kernel.org Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 Resend 00/10] trivial: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) Message-ID: <20150818090813.GC31148@linux> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12-08-15, 15:59, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > Andrew Morton suggested to take these patches through your tree and so > another resend. > > This cleans up the usage of IS_ERR(_OR_NULL)(), where the callers have > added additional unlikely compiler flag to them. It also fixes the > definition of IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), to use unlikely for all checks it does. Ping !! -- viresh