From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix Intel BTS/PT timestamp handling
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:28:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150820192803.GC3154@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440060692-5585-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Em Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:51:32AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> Events that don't sample the timestamp have a timestamp
> value of -1. Intel BTS and Intel PT processing wasn't
> taking that into account. This is particularly noticeable
> with Intel BTS because timestamps are not requested by
> default. Then, if the conversion of -1 to TSC results
> in a small number, the processing is unaffected.
> However if the conversion results in a big number, then
> the data is processed prematurely before relevant sideband
> data like mmap events, which in turn results in samples
> with unknown dsos.
Thanks, since the BTS code is not in, I'm splitting it from here, so
that this one only fixes what is upstream already, i.e. PT, and will
fold the BTS part with the patch introducing BTS,
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c
> index dce99cfb1309..ea768625ab5b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c
> @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static int intel_bts_process_event(struct perf_session *session,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (sample->time)
> + if (sample->time && sample->time != (u64)-1)
> timestamp = perf_time_to_tsc(sample->time, &bts->tc);
> else
> timestamp = 0;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> index 2a4a4120473b..a5acd2fe2447 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> @@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ static int intel_pt_process_event(struct perf_session *session,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (sample->time)
> + if (sample->time && sample->time != (u64)-1)
> timestamp = perf_time_to_tsc(sample->time, &pt->tc);
> else
> timestamp = 0;
> --
> 1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-20 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 8:51 [PATCH] perf tools: Fix Intel BTS/PT timestamp handling Adrian Hunter
2015-08-20 19:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-08-22 6:52 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Fix Intel PT " tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150820192803.GC3154@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox