From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Context-track syscalls before enabling interrupts
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:50:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150821075035.GB9511@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150819171007.GA21717@lerouge>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I want to have a real hook to call that says "switch to IRQ context from
> > CONTEXT_USER" or "switch to IRQ context from CONTEXT_KERNEL" (aka noop), but
> > that doesn't currently exist.
>
> You're not answering _why_ you want that.
So we'd have a comprehensive, 100% coverage, self-sufficient set of callbacks that
track the kernel's current context state at the points where the context switches
actually occur - not just something cobbled together heterogenously. The low level
x86 asm code was rather messy in this area, better organization would be welcome,
I don't think we can overdo it.
( I'm assuming here that it can all be done for zero or negative cost, and that
the result will be correct and won't hurt existing users in any fashion. )
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-21 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-18 19:11 [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Context-track syscalls before enabling interrupts Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-18 22:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-18 22:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-18 23:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-18 23:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-19 17:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-21 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-08-21 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-19 0:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-19 15:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150821075035.GB9511@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox