From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] rcusync: Add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 19:42:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150821174250.GA17897@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150821174230.GA17867@redhat.com>
It would be nice to validate that the caller of rcu_sync_is_idle()
holds the corresponding type of RCU read-side lock. Add the new
rcu_sync_ops->held() method and change rcu_sync_is_idle() to
WARN() if it returns false.
This obviously penalizes the readers (fast-path), but only if
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU.
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/rcusync.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/rcu/sync.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcusync.h b/include/linux/rcusync.h
index ff86315..631a842 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcusync.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcusync.h
@@ -17,9 +17,15 @@ struct rcu_sync_struct {
enum rcu_sync_type gp_type;
};
+extern bool __rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
+
static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
+ return __rcu_sync_is_idle(rss);
+#else
return !rss->gp_state; /* GP_IDLE */
+#endif
}
extern void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *, enum rcu_sync_type);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/sync.c b/kernel/rcu/sync.c
index 99051b7..0ab7cbd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/sync.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/sync.c
@@ -1,21 +1,33 @@
#include <linux/rcusync.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
+#define __INIT_HELD(func) .held = func,
+#else
+#define __INIT_HELD(func)
+#endif
+
static const struct {
void (*sync)(void);
void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
+ int (*held)(void);
+#endif
} gp_ops[] = {
[RCU_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_rcu,
.call = call_rcu,
+ __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_held)
},
[RCU_SCHED_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_sched,
.call = call_rcu_sched,
+ __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_sched_held)
},
[RCU_BH_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_rcu_bh,
.call = call_rcu_bh,
+ __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_bh_held)
},
};
@@ -24,6 +36,14 @@ enum { CB_IDLE = 0, CB_PENDING, CB_REPLAY };
#define rss_lock gp_wait.lock
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
+bool __rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
+{
+ WARN_ON(!gp_ops[rss->gp_type].held());
+ return rss->gp_state == GP_IDLE;
+}
+#endif
+
void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss, enum rcu_sync_type type)
{
memset(rss, 0, sizeof(*rss));
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-21 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 17:42 [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-21 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-21 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] rcusync: Introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-21 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-08-21 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] rcusync: Introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-21 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] percpu-rwsem: make percpu_free_rwsem() after kzalloc() safe Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-21 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] percpu-rwsem: change it to rely on rss_sync infrastructure Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-21 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] percpu-rwsem: fix the comments outdated by rcu_sync Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-21 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] percpu-rwsem: cleanup the lockdep annotations in percpu_down_read() Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-22 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-24 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-24 18:31 ` parse_args() is too unforgivable? Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 1:24 ` Rusty Russell
2015-08-25 15:18 ` [PATCH 0/1] params: don't ignore the rest of cmdline if parse_one() fails Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-26 0:13 ` Rusty Russell
2015-08-26 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-26 12:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-26 12:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-26 14:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150821174250.GA17897@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).