[RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq: Fix coding style issues

[RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq: Fix coding style issues

[Muhammad Falak R Wani]

This patch introduces a blank line after declarations, which
fix the checkpatch.pl warnings at 3 places.

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 8ae655c..5aea659 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -718,6 +718,7 @@ static ssize_t show_bios_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
 {
 	unsigned int limit;
 	int ret;
+
 	if (cpufreq_driver->bios_limit) {
 		ret = cpufreq_driver->bios_limit(policy->cpu, &limit);
 		if (!ret)
@@ -815,6 +816,7 @@ unlock:
 static void cpufreq_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = to_policy(kobj);
+
 	pr_debug("last reference is dropped\n");
 	complete(&policy->kobj_unregister);
 }
@@ -2129,6 +2131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor);
 int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *cpu_policy;
+
 	if (!policy)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq: Fix coding style issues

[Viresh Kumar]

On 23-08-15, 22:13, Muhammad Falak R Wani wrote:
> This patch introduces a blank line after declarations, which
> fix the checkpatch.pl warnings at 3 places.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 8ae655c..5aea659 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -718,6 +718,7 @@ static ssize_t show_bios_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>  {
>  	unsigned int limit;
>  	int ret;
> +
>  	if (cpufreq_driver->bios_limit) {
>  		ret = cpufreq_driver->bios_limit(policy->cpu, &limit);
>  		if (!ret)
> @@ -815,6 +816,7 @@ unlock:
>  static void cpufreq_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>  {
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = to_policy(kobj);
> +
>  	pr_debug("last reference is dropped\n");
>  	complete(&policy->kobj_unregister);
>  }
> @@ -2129,6 +2131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor);
>  int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *cpu_policy;
> +
>  	if (!policy)
>  		return -EINVAL;

We don't really need a patch for this, unless Rafael wants to apply
this one :)

-- 
viresh