From: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
To: cpaul@redhat.com
Cc: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jerome Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Benjamin Tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DRM - radeon: Don't link train DisplayPort on HPD until we get the dpcd
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:47:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150824134740.GA1941@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440180972-29580-1-git-send-email-cpaul@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:16:12PM -0400, cpaul@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Stephen Chandler Paul <cpaul@redhat.com>
>
> Most of the time this isn't an issue since hotplugging an adaptor will
> trigger a crtc mode change which in turn, causes the driver to probe
> every DisplayPort for a dpcd. However, in cases where hotplugging
> doesn't cause a mode change (specifically when one unplugs a monitor
> from a DisplayPort connector, then plugs that same monitor back in
> seconds later on the same port without any other monitors connected), we
> never probe for the dpcd before starting the initial link training. What
> happens from there looks like this:
>
> - GPU has only one monitor connected. It's connected via
> DisplayPort, and does not go through an adaptor of any sort.
>
> - User unplugs DisplayPort connector from GPU.
>
> - Change in HPD is detected by the driver, we probe every
> DisplayPort for a possible connection.
>
> - Probe the port the user originally had the monitor connected
> on for it's dpcd. This fails, and we clear the first (and only
> the first) byte of the dpcd to indicate we no longer have a
> dpcd for this port.
>
> - User plugs the previously disconnected monitor back into the
> same DisplayPort.
>
> - radeon_connector_hotplug() is called before everyone else,
> and tries to handle the link training. Since only the first
> byte of the dpcd is zeroed, the driver is able to complete
> link training but does so against the wrong dpcd, causing it
> to initialize the link with the wrong settings.
>
> - Display stays blank (usually), dpcd is probed after the
> initial link training, and the driver prints no obvious
> messages to the log.
>
> In theory, since only one byte of the dpcd is chopped off (specifically,
> the byte that contains the revision information for DisplayPort), it's
> not entirely impossible that this bug may not show on certain monitors.
> For instance, the only reason this bug was visible on my ASUS PB238
> monitor was due to the fact that this monitor using the enhanced framing
> symbol sequence, the flag for which is ignored if the radeon driver
> thinks that the DisplayPort version is below 1.1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Chandler Paul <cpaul@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
This should be added to stable
cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> index 94b21ae..5a2cafb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,11 @@ void radeon_connector_hotplug(struct drm_connector *connector)
> if (!radeon_hpd_sense(rdev, radeon_connector->hpd.hpd)) {
> drm_helper_connector_dpms(connector, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
> } else if (radeon_dp_needs_link_train(radeon_connector)) {
> + /* Don't try to start link training before we
> + * have the dpcd */
> + if (!radeon_dp_getdpcd(radeon_connector))
> + return;
> +
> /* set it to OFF so that drm_helper_connector_dpms()
> * won't return immediately since the current state
> * is ON at this point.
> --
> 2.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 18:16 [PATCH] DRM - radeon: Don't link train DisplayPort on HPD until we get the dpcd cpaul
2015-08-21 22:06 ` Alex Deucher
2015-08-24 13:47 ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2015-08-24 13:50 ` Deucher, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150824134740.GA1941@gmail.com \
--to=j.glisse@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=cpaul@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox