From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754107AbbHXUIo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:08:44 -0400
Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:49517 "EHLO
	e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751153AbbHXUIm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:08:42 -0400
X-Helo: d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com
X-MailFrom: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
X-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:08:37 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: two RCU torture bugs
Message-ID: <20150824200837.GM11078@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
References: <20150823.220749.376054183826529698.davem@davemloft.net>
 <20150824052915.GD11078@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20150824185036.GA20889@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20150824.115659.412694779048156486.davem@davemloft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150824.115659.412694779048156486.davem@davemloft.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 15082420-0033-0000-0000-0000059CEC50
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:56:59AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:50:36 -0700
> 
> > @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static bool __maybe_unused torturing_tasks(void)
> >  
> >  #define RCUTORTURE_TASKS_OPS
> >  
> > -static bool torturing_tasks(void)
> > +static bool __maybe_unused torturing_tasks(void)
> >  {
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> 
> This hunk gave a reject for me and I suspect was not intended to be included
> in this fix?

Yeah, I should split that out, thank you for calling it out.  And yes,
I made the patch against my experimental branch, so mileage may vary.

> I'll test the rest of the patch since that appears to be the important part.
> :-)

Thank you!

								Thanx, Paul