From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: "Raphaël Beamonte" <raphael.beamonte@gmail.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Yunlong Song" <yunlong.song@huawei.com>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
"Kan Liang" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Hemant Kumar" <hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"Wang Nan" <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix confusing messages when not able to read trace events files
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:51:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150824205155.GH3699@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150820135201.GB2567@codeblueprint.co.uk>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:52:01PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
SNIP
> > The err variable doesn't go down to the add_tracepoint_multi_event()
> > call. It actually stops in parse_events_parse() where
> > parse_events_add_tracepoint is being called using only the idx part of
> > data (util/parse-events.y:389). I think it would be possible to pass
> > the whole data variable (struct parse_events_evlist) down those
> > variables to still have access to &err, but it would imply quite a lot
> > of changes in there. I'm up to it though, if it seems that's the right
> > thing to do! What is your take on
>
> You bring up a good point. Perf would benefit greatly from easy access
> to a struct parse_events_error variable, so that it isn't required to
> pass it as an argument to every function.
>
> Now, I know that generally global variables are frowned upon but I
> think an exception can be made for error handling, because, assuming
> errors are fatal (and if they're not they're called warnings), you
> should never have multiple things writing to it at the same time, and
> you should only ever execute error paths once you've written to it.
>
> And if you really, really don't like naked accesses to global
> variables you can always use a wrapper function.
>
> With global access to error data it becomes trivial to improve the
> error handling of other functions in a piecemeal way, without
> requiring changes to every function in the callstack. No one likes
> reviewing large patches ;-)
>
> I would suggest setting up a global struct parse_events_error object,
> and making changes to parse_events_print_error() to handle non-parse
> related errors, such as ENOMEM, ENOENT, etc, etc.
hum, I haven't digested all of this thread yet, but I happened
to actually work on this recently - the tracepoint parsing
error propagation ... I did some initial patchset not ready
to be posted but working, please check it in:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git/log/?h=perf/tp_5
tracefs and debugfs just give location for accessing tracepoint,
the tracing_events_path is currently initialized to one of them
we could somehow prettyfy it, like unify all the related
interface to make it clear, like the debugfs__strerror_open
shouldn't be 'debugfs' specific and take tracefs into account
as in my patchset
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 1:39 [PATCH] perf: bugzilla 100781 Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 1:39 ` [PATCH] perf: fix confusing messages when not able to read trace events files Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-18 11:43 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-18 17:45 ` Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-20 13:52 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-24 20:51 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150824205155.GH3699@krava.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=raphael.beamonte@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=yunlong.song@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox