From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754694AbbHXU7G (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:59:06 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:40434 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750942AbbHXU7D (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:59:03 -0400 X-Helo: d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com X-MailFrom: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:58:57 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: David Miller Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: two RCU torture bugs Message-ID: <20150824205857.GP11078@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20150824185036.GA20889@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150824.115659.412694779048156486.davem@davemloft.net> <20150824200837.GM11078@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150824.133948.1687898700210314090.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150824.133948.1687898700210314090.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15082420-0009-0000-0000-00000D810E75 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:39:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Paul E. McKenney" > Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:08:37 -0700 > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:56:59AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> From: "Paul E. McKenney" > >> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:50:36 -0700 > >> > >> > @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static bool __maybe_unused torturing_tasks(void) > >> > > >> > #define RCUTORTURE_TASKS_OPS > >> > > >> > -static bool torturing_tasks(void) > >> > +static bool __maybe_unused torturing_tasks(void) > >> > { > >> > return false; > >> > } > >> > >> This hunk gave a reject for me and I suspect was not intended to be included > >> in this fix? > > > > Yeah, I should split that out, thank you for calling it out. And yes, > > I made the patch against my experimental branch, so mileage may vary. > > > >> I'll test the rest of the patch since that appears to be the important part. > >> :-) > > > > Thank you! > > It appears to work and the documentation update looks great too, so for both: > > Acked-by: David S. Miller Thank you very much, applied! Thanx, Paul