public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix tsk->pi_lock isn't held when do_set_cpus_allowed()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:05:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825100527.GO16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP97219F013A6E029CAEB5D280610@phx.gbl>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 03:59:54PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -2376,8 +2376,12 @@ void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cpumask *pmask)
>  
>  void cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
>  	do_set_cpus_allowed(tsk, task_cs(tsk)->effective_cpus);
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();

Aside from the double lock thing that was already pointed out, I think
this is wrong, because the select_task_rq() call can already have
pi_lock held.

Taking it again would result in a deadlock.

Consider for instance:

try_to_wake_up()
  raw_spin_lock_irqsave(->pi_lock)
  select_task_rq()
    select_ballback_rq()
      cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback()
        raw_spin_lock_irqsave(->pi_lock)


The problem is with the migration path and should be fixed there.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-25 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-25  7:59 [PATCH] sched: fix tsk->pi_lock isn't held when do_set_cpus_allowed() Wanpeng Li
2015-08-25  8:13 ` Leo Yan
2015-08-25  8:24   ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-25  8:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-25  8:38       ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-25 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-08-25 10:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-25 10:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]       ` <BLU437-SMTP7261DF7A82716F49242C7B80610@phx.gbl>
2015-08-27 22:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-28  1:49           ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-25 10:18   ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-27 13:47 ` T. Zhou
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-25  7:56 Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150825100527.GO16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox