public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: Re: h8300 build failures in linux-next (in rcu code, gcc 5.x related, not limited to h8300)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:02:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825180252.GA13318@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150825173413.GA11853@redhat.com>

On 08/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 08/26, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> >
> > Yes.
> > gcc bug #67055.
> > Already fixed in trunk.
>
> Yes, thanks a lot.
>
> Paul, it seems that gcc actually dislikes your ec90a194a "rcu:
> Create a synchronize_rcu_mult()" commit ;) rcu/sync.c was just
> lucky enough to trigger the problem.
>
> I'll try to make the fix today...

Mark, Guenter, any chance you can check if the patch below helps?
It does on x86.

Oleg.

--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -230,12 +230,11 @@ void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n, call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
 		   struct rcu_synchronize *rs_array);
 
 #define _wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ...) \
-do { \
-	call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; \
-	const int __n = ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array); \
-	struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[__n]; \
-	\
-	__wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, __n, __crcu_array, __rs_array); \
+do {									\
+	call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; 		\
+	struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array)];	\
+	__wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array),		\
+			__crcu_array, __rs_array); 			\
 } while (0)
 
 #define wait_rcu_gp(...) _wait_rcu_gp(false, __VA_ARGS__)


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-25 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-24 18:34 h8300 build failures ijn linux-next Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25  5:56 ` Yoshinori Sato
2015-08-25 14:27   ` Mark Salter
2015-08-25 15:03     ` h8300 build failures in linux-next (in rcu code, gcc 5.x related, not limited to h8300) Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25 16:11       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 16:23         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 16:51       ` Yoshinori Sato
2015-08-25 17:34         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 18:02           ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-08-25 18:16             ` Mark Salter
2015-08-25 18:45       ` [PATCH] rcu: change _wait_rcu_gp() to work around gcc 67055 bug Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 19:00         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-25 19:02         ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150825180252.GA13318@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox