From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@nvidia.com>,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com,
wangnan0@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: kgdb: Don't try to stop the machine when setting breakpoints
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:26:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825222626.GK19120@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440540165-28875-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
On 08/25, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In (23a4e40 arm: kgdb: Handle read-only text / modules) we moved to
> using patch_text() to set breakpoints so that we could handle the case
> when we had CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA. That patch used patch_text().
> Unfortunately, patch_text() assumes that we're not in atomic context
> when it runs since it needs to grab a mutex and also wait for other
> CPUs to stop (which it does with a completion).
>
> This would result in a stack crawl if you had
> CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and tried to set a breakpoint in kgdb. The
> crawl looked something like:
>
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x00010007
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc7-00133-geb63b34 #1073
> Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree)
> (unwind_backtrace) from [<c00133d4>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
> (show_stack) from [<c05400e8>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xb8)
> (dump_stack) from [<c004913c>] (__schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c)
> (__schedule_bug) from [<c054065c>] (__schedule+0x80/0x668)
> (__schedule) from [<c0540cfc>] (schedule+0xb8/0xd4)
> (schedule) from [<c0543a3c>] (schedule_timeout+0x2c/0x234)
> (schedule_timeout) from [<c05417c0>] (wait_for_common+0xf4/0x188)
> (wait_for_common) from [<c0541874>] (wait_for_completion+0x20/0x24)
> (wait_for_completion) from [<c00a0104>] (__stop_cpus+0x58/0x70)
> (__stop_cpus) from [<c00a0580>] (stop_cpus+0x3c/0x54)
> (stop_cpus) from [<c00a06c4>] (__stop_machine+0xcc/0xe8)
> (__stop_machine) from [<c00a0714>] (stop_machine+0x34/0x44)
> (stop_machine) from [<c00173e8>] (patch_text+0x28/0x34)
> (patch_text) from [<c001733c>] (kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint+0x40/0x4c)
> (kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint) from [<c00a0d68>] (kgdb_validate_break_address+0x2c/0x60)
> (kgdb_validate_break_address) from [<c00a0e90>] (dbg_set_sw_break+0x1c/0xdc)
> (dbg_set_sw_break) from [<c00a2e88>] (gdb_serial_stub+0x9c4/0xba4)
> (gdb_serial_stub) from [<c00a11cc>] (kgdb_cpu_enter+0x1f8/0x60c)
> (kgdb_cpu_enter) from [<c00a18cc>] (kgdb_handle_exception+0x19c/0x1d0)
> (kgdb_handle_exception) from [<c0016f7c>] (kgdb_compiled_brk_fn+0x30/0x3c)
> (kgdb_compiled_brk_fn) from [<c00091a4>] (do_undefinstr+0x1a4/0x20c)
> (do_undefinstr) from [<c001400c>] (__und_svc_finish+0x0/0x34)
>
> It turns out that when we're in kgdb all the CPUs are stopped anyway
> so there's no reason we should be calling patch_text(). We can
> instead directly call __patch_text() which assumes that CPUs have
> already been stopped.
>
> Fixes: 23a4e4050ba9 ("arm: kgdb: Handle read-only text / modules")
> Reported-by: Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-25 22:02 [PATCH] arm: kgdb: Don't try to stop the machine when setting breakpoints Douglas Anderson
2015-08-25 22:26 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-08-26 0:32 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825222626.GK19120@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avienamo@nvidia.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox