From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, matt.fleming@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
qiuxishi@huawei.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem_mirror" boot option
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:46:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825234618.GC3013@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440090960-15252-1-git-send-email-izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 21 Aug, at 02:16:00AM, Taku Izumi wrote:
> This patch introduces new boot option named "efi_fake_mem_mirror".
> By specifying this parameter, you can mark specific memory as
> mirrored memory. This is useful for debugging of Address Range
> Mirroring feature.
>
> For example, if you specify "efi_fake_mem_mirror=2G@4G,2G@0x10a0000000",
> the original (firmware provided) EFI memmap will be updated so that
> the specified memory regions have EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE attribute:
>
> <original EFI memmap>
> efi: mem00: [Boot Data | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000001000) (0MB)
> efi: mem01: [Loader Data | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000000001000-0x0000000000002000) (0MB)
> ...
> efi: mem35: [Boot Data | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000047ee6000-0x0000000048014000) (1MB)
> efi: mem36: [Conventional Memory| | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000100000000-0x00000020a0000000) (129536MB)
> efi: mem37: [Reserved |RUN| | | | | | | | |UC] range=[0x0000000060000000-0x0000000090000000) (768MB)
>
> <updated EFI memmap>
> efi: mem00: [Boot Data | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000001000) (0MB)
> efi: mem01: [Loader Data | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000000001000-0x0000000000002000) (0MB)
> ...
> efi: mem35: [Boot Data | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000047ee6000-0x0000000048014000) (1MB)
> efi: mem36: [Conventional Memory| |RELY| | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000100000000-0x0000000180000000) (2048MB)
> efi: mem37: [Conventional Memory| | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000180000000-0x00000010a0000000) (61952MB)
> efi: mem38: [Conventional Memory| |RELY| | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x00000010a0000000-0x0000001120000000) (2048MB)
> efi: mem39: [Conventional Memory| | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000001120000000-0x00000020a0000000) (63488MB)
> efi: mem40: [Reserved |RUN| | | | | | | | |UC] range=[0x0000000060000000-0x0000000090000000) (768MB)
>
> And you will find that the following message is output:
>
> efi: Memory: 4096M/131455M mirrored memory
>
> Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index 1c7380d..5c785e1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
>
The quirks file isn't intended to be used for this kind of feature.
It's very much a repository for workarounds for quirky firmware, i.e.
known bugs.
Instead, how about putting all this into a new fake_mem.c file? Going
further than that, there's nothing that I can see that looks
particularly x86-specific, so how about sticking all this in
drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c so that the arm64 folks can make use
of it if/when they want to start playing around with
EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE?
> static efi_char16_t efi_dummy_name[6] = { 'D', 'U', 'M', 'M', 'Y', 0 };
>
> +#define EFI_MAX_FAKE_MIRROR 8
> +static struct range fake_mirrors[EFI_MAX_FAKE_MIRROR];
> +static int num_fake_mirror;
> +
> static bool efi_no_storage_paranoia;
>
> /*
> @@ -288,3 +292,168 @@ bool efi_poweroff_required(void)
> {
> return !!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware;
> }
> +
> +void __init efi_fake_memmap(void)
> +{
> + efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> + void *p, *q;
> + int i;
> + int nr_map = memmap.nr_map;
> + u64 start, end, m_start, m_end;
> + u64 new_memmap_phy;
> + void *new_memmap;
> +
> + if (!num_fake_mirror)
> + return;
> +
> + /* count up the number of EFI memory descriptor */
> + for (p = memmap.map; p < memmap.map_end; p += memmap.desc_size) {
> + md = p;
> + start = md->phys_addr;
> + end = start + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_fake_mirror; i++) {
> + /* mirroring range */
> + m_start = fake_mirrors[i].start;
> + m_end = fake_mirrors[i].end;
> +
> + if (m_start <= start) {
> + /* split into 2 parts */
> + if (start < m_end && m_end < end)
> + nr_map++;
> + }
> + if (start < m_start && m_start < end) {
> + /* split into 3 parts */
> + if (m_end < end)
> + nr_map += 2;
> + /* split into 2 parts */
> + if (end <= m_end)
> + nr_map++;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* allocate memory for new EFI memmap */
> + new_memmap_phy = memblock_alloc(memmap.desc_size * nr_map, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!new_memmap_phy)
> + return;
> +
> + /* create new EFI memmap */
> + new_memmap = early_memremap(new_memmap_phy, memmap.desc_size * nr_map);
> + for (p = memmap.map, q = new_memmap;
> + p < memmap.map_end;
> + p += memmap.desc_size, q += memmap.desc_size) {
Can we rename 'p' and 'q', 'old' and 'new'? Otherwise it gets a little
tricky to follow the below code.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 17:15 [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Introduce "efi_fake_mem_mirror" boot option Taku Izumi
2015-08-20 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] efi: Add EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE support to efi_md_typeattr_format() Taku Izumi
2015-08-25 14:18 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-25 14:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-08-25 15:03 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem_mirror" boot option Taku Izumi
2015-08-25 23:46 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2015-08-26 8:11 ` Izumi, Taku
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825234618.GC3013@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox