From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: wake_up_process implied memory barrier clarification
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:43:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150827124334.GY16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150827122727.GC27052@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:27:27PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> I have just stumbled over the comment above wake_up_process which
> claims:
> "
> * It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before
> * changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up.
> "
>
> but try_to_wake_up does smp_mb__before_spinlock and did smp_wmb
> since 04e2f1741d235 unconditionally. The comment was added when the
> smp_wmb was in place already so I am wondering whether the comment is
> wrong/misleading.
>
> Could somebody clarify please?
Its true for wake_up(), since that bails early if the waitqueue list is
empty.
I suspect there was no exception made for wake_up_process() to simplify
the rules.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-27 12:27 wake_up_process implied memory barrier clarification Michal Hocko
2015-08-27 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-08-27 13:14 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-27 18:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-28 14:51 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-28 16:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-29 9:25 ` Boqun Feng
2015-08-29 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-31 0:37 ` Boqun Feng
2015-08-31 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-31 20:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-01 3:40 ` Boqun Feng
2015-09-01 4:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-01 9:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-01 14:50 ` Boqun Feng
2015-09-01 16:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-02 1:10 ` Boqun Feng
2015-09-07 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-08 0:22 ` Boqun Feng
2015-09-01 9:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150827124334.GY16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox