From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: timing of module MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:53:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150831125326.GH29756@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87si70p7c9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Hi, Rusty -
Thanks for your response!
> [...]
> > That patch also moved the MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier call to
> > complete_formation(), which is relatively early to its former
> > do_init_module() call site. It now precedes the parse_args(),
> > mod_sysfs_setup(), and trace_module_load() steps.
>
> Yes, parse_args() can enter the module, so you really want it before
> then.
Understood. (Perhaps mod_sysfs_setup() could sneak in ahead.)
> > Was the latter part of the change intended & necessary? It is
> > negatively impacting systemtap, which was relying on
> > MODULE_STATE_COMING being called from a fairly complete module
> > state - just before the actual initializer function call.
> Notifiers suck for stuff like this :( Module state has many steps,
> so my preference has been to open-code explicit hooks. [...]
You mean something like the trace_module_load()? (We will probably
experiment with hooking into that tracepoint instead of the notifier.)
A more hard-coded one with an in-kernel callee probably wouldn't help
module-resident clients like us.
- FChE
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 0:06 timing of module MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier Frank Ch. Eigler
2015-08-31 1:36 ` Rusty Russell
2015-08-31 12:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler [this message]
2015-08-31 20:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2015-09-02 6:02 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150831125326.GH29756@redhat.com \
--to=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox