From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755375AbbIAJLo (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 05:11:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:38164 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752808AbbIAJLl (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 05:11:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:11:37 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Peter Griffin Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ohad@wizery.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: STiH407: Add nodes for RemoteProc Message-ID: <20150901091137.GN4796@x1> References: <1440757911-9120-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1440757911-9120-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20150901082812.GB30542@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150901082812.GB30542@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote: > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > index 33daa49..89a363c 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > @@ -608,5 +608,53 @@ > > status = "okay"; > > tx-only; > > }; > > + > > + st231_gp0: st231-gp0@0 { > > + compatible = "st,st231-rproc"; > > + reg = <0x40000000 0x01000000>; > > + reg-names = "carveout"; > > + resets = <&softreset STIH407_ST231_GP0_SOFTRESET>; > > Support for these co-processor reset lines does not exist upstream. So > this series as it stands won't compile. That's true. I have the support as part of some DEBUG patches I have in my branch. Are you aware of a plan for these, or should I upstream them myself as part of this set? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog