From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, tools: Always use non inlined file name for srcfile
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 16:21:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150901192144.GA25466@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150901184839.GA4524@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:48:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:36:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:42AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > When profiling the kernel with srcfile it's common to "get
> > > stuck" in include. For example a lot of code uses current
> > > or other inlines, so they get accounted to some random
> > > include file. This is not very useful as a high level
> > > categorization.
> >
> > Cool idea :-)
>
> Yes.
>
> It would be also nice to use this information for unwinding
> (so to show the inline stack as part of the call graph)
Yes, agreed.
> > Why not the so much simpler:
> >
> > while (bfd_find_inliner_info(...));
> >
> > But other than that, wouldn't be better to put an upper limit on this?
> >
> > Say, 1024 levels of unwinding to avoid tripping in some bfd lib bug that
> > could make this function always return true and make addr2line get stuck
> > in an infinite loop?
>
> Done. I sent a v2.
Thanks, I applied v2.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 18:11 [PATCH] perf, tools: Always use non inlined file name for srcfile Andi Kleen
2015-09-01 18:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-01 18:48 ` Andi Kleen
2015-09-01 19:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-01 18:47 Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150901192144.GA25466@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox