From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754677AbbIBNHb (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:07:31 -0400
Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:48180 "EHLO muru.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750971AbbIBNH2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:07:28 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 06:07:24 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Neil Brown <neil@brown.name>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
        "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        real GTA04 owners <gta04-owner@goldelico.com>,
        Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] twl4030_charger: correctly handle -EPROBE_DEFER
 from devm_usb_get_phy_by_node
Message-ID: <20150902130724.GQ4215@atomide.com>
References: <20150730001113.4012.18086.stgit@noble>
 <20150730001124.4012.31980.stgit@noble>
 <CAMAWPa__hFOuz24YBcFiR+m5mOUArSuNpuqh3Ju1H+yj6qadfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMAWPa_s2ELgRBRtWzFucmREMuLXS_V5Akmad5yFU13-GrzBDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87si6x4a2f.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87si6x4a2f.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Neil Brown <neil@brown.name> [150901 23:23]:
> Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> > ping... this boot failure has now landed in mainline
> 
> sorry, I'm on leave at the moment and travelling so I'm unlikely to be
> able to look at this properly.  I should be able to examine this issue
> before the end of the month but cannot promise sooner than that (though
> it is not impossible).
> 
> Maybe it would be best to just revert it until a proper analysis can be
> done.

OK yeah let's revert this one for now until we know what goes wrong.

Regards,

Tony