From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751725AbbICISf (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2015 04:18:35 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:29810 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751332AbbICISc (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2015 04:18:32 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,460,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="796884074" Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 13:50:46 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lee Jones , Alexandre Belloni , Linux-Next , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the pm, mfd and rtc trees Message-ID: <20150903082046.GX13546@localhost> References: <20150827112645.6c30e106@canb.auug.org.au> <20150827032405.GS13546@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:17:25AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:26:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi Vinod, > >> > >> Today's linux-next merge of the slave-dma tree got conflicts in: > >> > >> drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> drivers/dma/Makefile > >> > >> between commit: > >> > >> 667dfed98615 ("dmaengine: add a driver for Intel integrated DMA 64-bit") > >> > >> from the pm, mfd and rtc trees and commits: > >> > >> 3c21619077be ("dmaengine: sort the Kconfig") > >> 7e97229b3920 ("dmaengine: sort the makefile") > >> > >> from the slave-dma tree. > >> > >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > >> is required). > > > > Thanks Stephen, > > > > I looked at this and merge is sorted, so looks good to me > > Sorted by Kconfig symbol or by name? I did by symbols. That also reminds me that we are not consistent in our symbols, right now seems free for all. Ideally we should all be DMA_xxxx -- ~Vinod