From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753277AbbIGRPK (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2015 13:15:10 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51968 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751331AbbIGRPG (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2015 13:15:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 18:15:01 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" Cc: Robert Richter , Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Will Deacon , Robert Richter , Tirumalesh Chalamarla , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] irqchip, gicv3: Workaround for Cavium ThunderX erratum 23154 Message-ID: <20150907171501.GD10645@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1439576885-15621-1-git-send-email-rric@kernel.org> <1439576885-15621-3-git-send-email-rric@kernel.org> <55EDC12E.8000408@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55EDC12E.8000408@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:54:06PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > On 14/08/15 19:28, Robert Richter wrote: > >diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > >index c52f7ba205b4..4211c39b8744 100644 > >--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > >+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > >@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void gic_redist_wait_for_rwp(void) > > ... > > >+} > >+ > > static void __maybe_unused gic_write_pmr(u64 val) > > { > > asm volatile("msr_s " __stringify(ICC_PMR_EL1) ", %0" : : "r" (val)); > >@@ -766,6 +798,12 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = { > > .free = gic_irq_domain_free, > > }; > > > >+static void gicv3_enable_quirks(void) > >+{ > >+ if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23154)) > >+ static_key_slow_inc(&is_cavium_thunderx); > > May be you could use the enable() method added to struct arm64_cpu_capability > here to perform the above operation, added by James : > > commit 1c0763037f1e1caef739e36e09c6d41ed7b61b2d > Author: James Morse > Date: Tue Jul 21 13:23:28 2015 +0100 > > arm64: kernel: Add cpufeature 'enable' callback I thought about this as well when looking at the patch but decided it's better as it is. The "enable" method is meant to enable per-CPU features (or workarounds) but here it is about GICv3, so we don't want to enable for every CPU. -- Catalin