From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755028AbbIHOVz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:21:55 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:37759 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754535AbbIHOVw (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:21:52 -0400
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:21:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Raphael Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@gmail.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/15] perf/core improvements and fixes
Message-ID: <20150908142147.GA16696@gmail.com>
References: <1441415203-7484-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
 <20150908140912.GA2435@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150908140912.GA2435@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> wrote:

> Em Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 10:06:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Hi Ingo,
> > 
> > 	Please consider pulling, this is on top of the previous pull request,
> > perf-core-for-mingo.
> 
> 	Ingo, please do not pull this 'perf-core-for-mingo-2' tag, there were
> some misunderstandings about the acks for "Move sw clock metrics
> printout to stat-shadow" and Jiri and Andi are working that out.
> 
> 	I'll remove those patches and get a new perf-core-for-mingo-2
> tag in place, before continuing today's batch, which possibly will be
> available as 'perf-core-for-mingo-3'
> 
> 	What is in 'perf-core-for-mingo" should be Ok.

Ok!

Thanks,

	Ingo