From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/{cpuset,core}: restore complete root_domain status across hotplug
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 17:11:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150909151134.GU16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441188096-23021-2-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:01:33AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hotplug operations are destructive w.r.t data associated with cpuset;
> in this case we care about root_domains. SCHED_DEADLINE puts bandwidth
> information regarding admitted tasks on root_domains, information that
> is gone when an hotplug operation happens. Also, it is not currently
> possible to tell to which task(s) the allocated bandwidth belongs, as
> this link is lost after sched_setscheduler() succeeds.
>
> This patch forces rebuilding of allocated bandwidth information at
> root_domain level after cpuset_hotplug_workfn() callback is done
> setting up scheduling and root domains.
> +static void cpuset_hotplug_update_rd(void)
> +{
> + struct cpuset *cs;
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cs, pos_css, &top_cpuset) {
> + if (!css_tryget_online(&cs->css))
> + continue;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + update_tasks_rd(cs);
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + css_put(&cs->css);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * cpuset_hotplug_workfn - handle CPU/memory hotunplug for a cpuset
> *
> * This function is called after either CPU or memory configuration has
> @@ -2296,6 +2335,8 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> /* rebuild sched domains if cpus_allowed has changed */
> if (cpus_updated)
> rebuild_sched_domains();
> +
> + cpuset_hotplug_update_rd();
> }
So the problem is that rebuild_sched_domains() destroys rd->dl_bw ? I
worry the above is racy in that you do not restore under the same
cpuset_mutex instance as you rebuild.
That is, what will stop a new task from joining the cpuset and
overloading the bandwidth between the root-domain getting rebuild and
restoring the bandwidth?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-02 10:01 [PATCH 0/4] sched fixes and clean-ups Juri Lelli
2015-09-02 10:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/{cpuset,core}: restore complete root_domain status across hotplug Juri Lelli
2015-09-09 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-09-10 9:03 ` Juri Lelli
2015-09-02 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/deadline: unify dl_time_before usage Juri Lelli
2015-09-23 8:46 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Unify dl_time_before() usage tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2015-09-02 10:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] locking/rtmutex: fix open coded check in rt_mutex_waiter_less() Juri Lelli
2015-09-23 8:47 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline, locking/rtmutex: Fix " tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2015-09-02 10:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/rt: make (do_)balance_runtime() return void Juri Lelli
2015-09-23 8:47 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/rt: Make " tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2015-09-18 9:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched fixes and clean-ups Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150909151134.GU16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox