From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:23:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150910102322.GV3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441301316-17789-1-git-send-email-izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:28:36AM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote:
> +struct pci2phy_map *__find_pci2phy_map(int segment)
> +{
> + struct pci2phy_map *map;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
> + if (map->segment == segment)
> + return map;
> + }
> +
> + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_ATOMIC);
So Ingo would really rather you didn't add a GFP_ATOMIC here; they are
rather fragile.
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150901113147.GA11161@gmail.com
I figured you'd come up with something... :/
> + if (map) {
> + map->segment = segment;
> + list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
> + }
> +
> + return map;
> +}
Something like this might work; but please consider it carefully,
because I certainly didn't.
struct pci2phy_map *__find_pci2phy_map(int segment)
{
struct pci2phy_map *map, *alloc = NULL;
lockdep_assert_held(&pci2phy_map_lock);
retry:
list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
if (map->segment == segment)
goto done;
}
if (!alloc) {
raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
alloc = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_KERNEL);
raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
if (alloc)
goto retry;
return NULL;
} else {
map = alloc;
alloc = NULL;
}
map->segment = segment;
list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
done:
if (alloc)
kfree(alloc);
return map;
}
> @@ -1106,16 +1107,26 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid)
> err = pci_read_config_dword(ubox_dev, 0x54, &config);
> if (err)
> break;
> +
> + segment = pci_domain_nr(ubox_dev->bus);
> + raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> + map = __find_pci2phy_map(segment);
> + if (!map) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + break;
And here you leak the lock..
> + }
> +
> /*
> * every three bits in the Node ID mapping register maps
> * to a particular node.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> if (nodeid == ((config >> (3 * i)) & 0x7)) {
> - uncore_pcibus_to_physid[bus] = i;
> + map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = i;
> break;
> }
> }
> + raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-03 17:28 [PATCH v3] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore Taku Izumi
2015-09-10 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150910102322.GV3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox