From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753478AbbIJRDB (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:03:01 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:34786 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbbIJRC7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:02:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:02:57 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Timur Tabi Cc: Linus Torvalds , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Russell King , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , lkml , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: updates for 4.3 Message-ID: <20150910170257.GH22439@arm.com> References: <20150904102656.GC4818@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 05:58:43PM +0100, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > * Hide direct DCC access from userspace > > Doesn't this make sense only if DCC is enabled for ARM64? These > patches are not part of your patchset: > > [v5] ARM64: TTY: hvc_dcc: Add support for ARM64 dcc > [v3] hvc_dcc: don't ignore errors during initialization Those patches should go via the usual route for tty changes (i.e. Greg). I merged the arm64 change here because it (a) makes sense as a standalone patch and (b) is a dependency for your other stuff. Will