From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751913AbbIKRzP (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:55:15 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:50641 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbbIKRzN (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:55:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:55:08 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Raj, Ashok" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck Subject: Re: [Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is surprised by offline CPUs Message-ID: <20150911175508.GF2042@pd.tnic> References: <1441931198-3209-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com> <20150911084636.GB2042@pd.tnic> <20150911180302.GA4233@otc-brkl-03.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911180302.GA4233@otc-brkl-03.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 02:03:03PM -0400, Raj, Ashok wrote: > I think using gen_pool should be fine. Also seems the notify moved to > the mce_gen_pool_process(), so there should be no notifier calls from > the offline cpu. > > Let me take a respin and resend. I should have noticed.. apologies. No worries. :) This is to prove Tony wrong who thinks that nothing happens in MCA land. :-P -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.