Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf tools: Propagate error info from tp_format

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>]

Em Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:59:41PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte escreveu:
> 2015-09-14 16:53 GMT-04:00 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>:
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > @@ -234,7 +234,9 @@ struct perf_evsel *perf_evsel__newtp_idx(const char *sys, const char *name, int
> >         struct perf_evsel *evsel = zalloc(perf_evsel__object.size);
> >         int err = -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -       if (evsel != NULL) {
> > +       if (evsel == NULL) {
> > +               goto out_err;
> > +       } else {
> 
> Is the else really necessary after a goto?

Not really, we can remove it and all would be equivalent (the code
with/without should be the same), its just that I wanted to avoid
touching the identation to reduce patch size and since we need o open a
brace to declare that attr variable...

- Arnaldo
 
> >                 struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> >                         .type          = PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
> >                         .sample_type   = (PERF_SAMPLE_RAW | PERF_SAMPLE_TIME |
> > @@ -261,6 +263,7 @@ struct perf_evsel *perf_evsel__newtp_idx(const char *sys, const char *name, int
> >  out_free:
> >         zfree(&evsel->name);
> >         free(evsel);
> > +out_err:
> >         return ERR_PTR(err);
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event.c b/tools/perf/util/trace-event.c
> > index 8e3a60e3e15f..802bb868d446 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event.c
> > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ struct event_format*
> >  trace_event__tp_format(const char *sys, const char *name)
> >  {
> >         if (!tevent_initialized && trace_event__init2())
> > -               return NULL;
> > +               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> >         return tp_format(sys, name);
> >  }