From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752025AbbINXWW (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:22:22 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:51170 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751198AbbINXWT (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:22:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:22:16 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Andrew Morton Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] alpha: fix build failure Message-ID: <20150914232216.GA14502@roeck-us.net> References: <1442231369-27118-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20150914212208.GA11482@roeck-us.net> <20150914142955.89422b158c598ef5bb8cc74d@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150914142955.89422b158c598ef5bb8cc74d@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:29:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:22:08 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 05:19:27PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > We were getting build failure on allmodconfig. Mainly two causes > > > ioremap_uc was not defined and __delay was not exported. > > > > > I already submitted patches to fix those problems some 6+ weeks ago. > > Hope you'll have more luck. > > I have both of these patches queued for 4.3. Cc'ing me is a way of > preventing stuff from falling through cracks.. > Ok, I'll do that next time. > But I didn't tag these patches for -stable backport. Should I have > done so? If 4.2 is busted on alpha then I guess "yes". > No, this only affects 4.3-rc1 and -next. Guenter