linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Linux Kernel Mailing List" 
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [4.2] commit d59cfc09c32 (sched, cgroup: replace signal_struct->group_rwsem with a global percpu_rwsem) causes regression for libvirt/kvm
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:38:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150915213830.GR4029@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150915212622.GC495@htj.duckdns.org>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:26:22PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:11:45PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > > In fact, I would say that any userspace-controlled call to *_expedited()
> > > is a bug waiting to happen and a bad idea---because userspace can, with
> > > little effort, end up calling it in a loop.
> > 
> > Right. This also implies that we should fix this for 4.2 - I guess.
> 
> Are the percpu_rwsem changes enough?  If so, we can try to backport
> those.  If those are too risky, we can revert the patches which
> switched threadgroup lock to percpu_rwsem.

I did take a shot at adding the rcu_sync stuff during this past merge
window, but it did not converge quickly enough to make it.  It looks
quite good for the next merge window.  There have been changes in most
of the relevant areas, so probably best to just try them and see which
works best.

							Thanx, Paul


  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-15 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-15 12:05 [4.2] commit d59cfc09c32 (sched, cgroup: replace signal_struct->group_rwsem with a global percpu_rwsem) causes regression for libvirt/kvm Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-15 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-15 13:36   ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-15 13:53     ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-15 16:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-15 17:38       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-16  8:32         ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-16  8:57           ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-16  9:12             ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-16 12:22               ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-16 12:35                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-16 12:43                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-16 12:56                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-16 14:16                 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-16 14:19                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-15 21:11       ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-15 21:26         ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-15 21:38           ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-09-15 22:28             ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-15 23:38               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-16  1:24                 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-16  4:35                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-16 11:06                     ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-16  7:44                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-16 10:58                     ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-16 11:03                       ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-16 11:50                         ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-09-16 15:55 ` [PATCH cgroup/for-4.3-fixes 1/2] Revert "cgroup: simplify threadgroup locking" Tejun Heo
2015-09-16 15:56   ` [PATCH cgroup/for-4.3-fixes 2/2] Revert "sched, cgroup: replace signal_struct->group_rwsem with a global percpu_rwsem" Tejun Heo
2015-09-16 17:00   ` [PATCH cgroup/for-4.3-fixes 1/2] Revert "cgroup: simplify threadgroup locking" Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-16 18:45   ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150915213830.GR4029@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).