From: Michael Grzeschik <mgr@pengutronix.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARCNET: fix hard_header_len limit
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:47:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150916124713.GA18173@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150805153451.GB20781@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:34:51PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:16:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
> > Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:34:36 +0200
> >
> > > The commit <9c7077622dd9> ("packet: make packet_snd fail on len smaller
> > > than l2 header") adds the check for minimum packet length of the used l2.
> > > For arcnet the hardware header length is not the complete archdr which
> > > includes hard + soft header. This patch changes the length to
> > > sizeof(arc_hardware).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > The hard header len is used for other purposes as well, are you sure
> > those don't get broken by this change?
>
> Its meaning is to represent the amount of the hardware (link layer)
> data of one packet.
>
> Which other purposes do you mean?
> Can you point to some code?
>
> > Code assumes that if the data at the SKB mac pointer is taken, for
> > dev->hard_header_len bytes, that is exactly the link layer header.
> > And that this can be used to compare two MAC headers, copy the
> > MAC header from one packet to another, etc.
>
> The link layer size of arcnet is 4 bytes long. 1 byte source, 1 byte
> dest and two offset bytes. As described by struct arc_hardware in
> if_arcnet.h . The above condition is fulfilled when the mac pointer
> is 0.
>
> The following pending bytes of struct archdr have a variable meaning
> depending of the used protocol and are represented by an union.
> (network layer)
>
> In the case of raw packets, the payload comes immediately after the
> hard_header.
>
Ping!
I have the cleanup patches from Joe Perches and several ARCNET patches
on top, waiting to be posted on the list. What is your Opinion to my
Maintainer Request I send some weeks ago?
Michael
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-16 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 15:34 [PATCH] ARCNET: fix hard_header_len limit Michael Grzeschik
2015-09-16 12:47 ` Michael Grzeschik [this message]
2015-09-16 17:53 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-30 13:34 Michael Grzeschik
2015-07-30 18:16 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150916124713.GA18173@pengutronix.de \
--to=mgr@pengutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox